In re Shapiro

—Per Curiam.

Respondent was admitted to practice by this Court in 1981. He maintains an office for the practice of law in Saratoga Springs.

*947By petition dated October 27, 1993, the Committee on Professional Standards charged that respondent converted client funds (charge I), failed to maintain adequate books and records (charge II), failed to render an appropriate accounting to his client and failed to promptly pay over funds to his client (charge III), commingled personal funds with those of his clients (charge IV), and failed to cooperate with petitioner in its investigation of an inquiry…