Legal Opinion
In re Kahn
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided February 8, 2007PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Per curiam
Respondent was admitted to practice by this Court in 1975. He maintained an office for the practice of law in the Town of Woodstock, Ulster County.
In October 2006, this Court suspended respondent from practice pending consideration of disciplinary charges against him on the ground that he was guilty of professional misconduct immediately threatening the public interest (see Matter of Kahn, 33 AD3d 1040 [2006]). Thereafter, we granted petitioner’s motion for an order declaring that no factual issues were raised by the petition of charges and respondent’s answer, which admitted the charges and…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- In re BalokAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2003
- In re DalyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1996
- In re KahnAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2006
- In re MurdockAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1992
- In re BishopAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1994
3Cited by9 opinions
- In re SullivanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2007
- In re BreenAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2010
- In re KarnazesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2015
- In re KarnazesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2015
- In re KelleherAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2012
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.