Emmco Insurance v. Palatine Insurance
Wisconsin Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtCurrie, J.
As found in the trial court’s findings of fact, the plaintiff insurance company, by payment of the entire loss to Frese, became subrogated to any. rights Frese then had against the defendant insurance company upon the policy issued by the latter. Therefore, the issues presented on this appeal must be determined on the same basis as if the insured himself had brought suit on the policy to recover for his loss.
In this case we have a situation in which the defendant insurance company seeks to avoid its policy by showing that a statement written into the policy by its own agent, without any…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Bostwick v. Mutual Life Insurance Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1903
- Parsons, Rich & Co. v. LaneSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1906
- Glens Falls Insurance Co. v. MichaelIndiana Supreme Court · 1905
- Alkan v. New Hampshire InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 1881
- Vankirk v. Citizens' Insurance Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1891
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Jeske v. General Accident Fire & Life Assurance Corp.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1957
- Stockinger v. Central National InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 1964
- Farmers Mutual Fire & Lightning Ass'n v. La ValleeMissouri Court of Appeals · 1973
- Riteway Carriers, Inc. v. Stuyvesant Ins. CoCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1954
- Zepczyk v. NelsonWisconsin Supreme Court · 1967
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.