Smith v. Pacific Fire Ins. Co.
Court of Appeals of Texas
1Opinion of the Court
LESLIE, Chief Justice.
The Pacific Fire Insurance Company instituted this suit against Mack D. Smith and the Pepsi-Cola Bottling Company, a firm composed of Milton Ruth and Wesley C. Ruth, to recover $327.12. Defendants denied liability. The trial before the Court without a jury resulted in a judgment in favor of Pepsi-Cola, but against Smith for the amount claimed. He alone appeals.
There are no findings of fact and conclusions of law, and Smith alone briefs the case in this court.
The Insurance Company issued Smith an insurance policy contracting to indemnify him for damages above $50 to his…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Hamilton Fire Insurance v. GregerNew York Court of Appeals · 1927
- Emerson v. MillsTexas Supreme Court · 1892
- Magnolia Pipe Line Co. v. Security Union Ins. Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1931
- Camden Fire Ins. Ass'n v. Missouri, K. & T. Ry. Co. of TexasCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1915
- Phœnix Refining Co. v. WalkerCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1937
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Pacific Fire Ins. Co. v. SmithCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1949
- Pacific Fire Ins. Co. v. SmithCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1947
- Pacific Fire Ins. Co. v. SmithCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1946
- Pacific Fire Ins. Co. v. SmithCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1946