Legal Opinion

Emerson v. Mills

Texas Supreme Court

Decided February 16, 1892No. 3150PublishedCited by 24 opinions

The opinion states the case.

1Opinion of the Court

GABBETT, Presiding Judge,

Section B.—Suit was upon a promissory note executed by the appellant for land.

February 17,1880, one E. H. Wilson conveyed to the appellant S. P. Emerson a tract of land containing 680 acres, for which Emerson paid Wilson $3000 in cash and executed to him his three notes for $2000 each, due one, two, and three years after date. At the . time of the sale the parties knew that the title to forty acres of the land was in doubt, but supposed it could be perfected, and Wilson conveyed the entire tract by a deed with covenants of general warranty. All of the purchase money…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Clark v. HillsTexas Supreme Court · 1886
  2. G., C. & S. F. R'y Co. v. GreenleeTexas Supreme Court · 1884
  3. Baines v. Ullmann, Lewis & Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1888
  4. Missouri Pacific Railway Co. v. BartlettTexas Supreme Court · 1891

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. Taylor, Bastrop & Houston Railway Co. v. WarnerTexas Supreme Court · 1895
  2. Tisdale v. Panhandle & S. F. Ry. Co.Texas Commission of Appeals · 1921
  3. Wichita Valley Railway Co. v. WilliamsTexas Supreme Court · 1926
  4. Gulf, Colorado & Santa Fe Railway Co. v. JohnsonTexas Supreme Court · 1898
  5. American Produce Co. v. GonzalesTexas Commission of Appeals · 1928

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API