Legal Opinion
Pacific Fire Ins. Co. v. Smith
Court of Appeals of Texas
Decided April 11, 1947No. 2535PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
GRAY, Justice.
At a former day of this term, this cause was affirmed, Tex.Civ.App., 194 S.W.2d 583, for the reason that the statement of facts filed herein contained neither the approval of the attorney for 'appellee nor of the trial court, and, therefore, not in compliance with Rule 377(d), Texas R.C.P. Appellant, however, insisted that Rule No. 404 was the applicable rule and no objection having been made by appellee within thirty days, any objection that might have been made to the said statement of facts was waived. On appeal to the Supreme Court for an interpretation' and decision as to…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Simmonds v. St. Louis, Brownsville & Mexico Railway Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1936
- Hamilton Fire Insurance v. GregerNew York Court of Appeals · 1927
- Pacific Fire Insurance v. SmithTexas Supreme Court · 1947
- Walker v. DawleyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1928
- The Home Ins. Co. of N.Y. v. SmithMissouri Court of Appeals · 1940
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Westfall v. Lorenzo Gin CompanyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1956
- Pacific Fire Ins. Co. v. SmithCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1949
- Stanley v. LiebCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1951