Legal Opinion

People v. Salcido

California Court of Appeal, 5th District

Decided May 2, 2019No. E067578Published

1Opinion of the Court

RAMIREZ P. J.

*854*1098Defendant Sara Salcido was in the business of providing immigration services - typically, obtaining visas for her clients that would allow them to stay in the United States legally. Under the Immigration Consultant Act ( Bus. & Prof. Code, §§ 22440 - 22449 ) (Act), with certain exceptions, it is illegal for a person to act as an "immigration consultant" (as defined in the Act) unless he or she has complied with a host of consumer protection requirements, such as passing a background check and filing a bond. Defendant failed to comply with these.

As a result, in a bench trial,…

2Cases cited31 opinions

  1. Minnesota v. MurphySupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. United States v. KnightsSupreme Court of the United States · 2001
  3. Riley v. Cal. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2014
  4. De Canas v. BicaSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  5. Sperry v. Florida Ex Rel. Florida BarSupreme Court of the United States · 1963

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API