People v. Salcido
California Court of Appeal, 5th District
1Opinion of the Court
RAMIREZ P. J.
*854*1098Defendant Sara Salcido was in the business of providing immigration services - typically, obtaining visas for her clients that would allow them to stay in the United States legally. Under the Immigration Consultant Act ( Bus. & Prof. Code, §§ 22440 - 22449 ) (Act), with certain exceptions, it is illegal for a person to act as an "immigration consultant" (as defined in the Act) unless he or she has complied with a host of consumer protection requirements, such as passing a background check and filing a bond. Defendant failed to comply with these.
As a result, in a bench trial,…
2Cases cited31 opinions
- Minnesota v. MurphySupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- United States v. KnightsSupreme Court of the United States · 2001
- Riley v. Cal. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2014
- De Canas v. BicaSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Sperry v. Florida Ex Rel. Florida BarSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.