Legal Opinion
Goozh v. Capitol Souvenir Co., Inc.
District of Columbia Court of Appeals
Decided July 14, 1983No. 81-1480PublishedCited by 20 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
KELLY, Associate Judge,
Retired:
Appellants are fifty percent shareholders of the issued and outstanding stock of Capitol Souvenir Co., Inc. (CAPSCO), a District of Columbia corporation; appellees own the remaining fifty percent of those shares. After appellants filed suit for corporate dis solution, the parties agreed to the appointment of an auditor-master. By order dated January 31, 1980, the trial court approved the appointment of the master as well as a stipulation of the parties which authorized the master, inter alia, to rule on all legal issues which might arise during the proceedings…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Zvonik v. ZvonikSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1981
- Kardibin v. Associated HardwareSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1981
- Harris v. ClintonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1955
- Brown v. BrownDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1975
- D. M. W. Contracting Co. v. StolzCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1946
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- Tsintolas Realty Co. v. MendezDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2009
- Dyer v. BilaalDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2009
- Matter of LarsenSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1992
- Makins v. District of ColumbiaCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2002
- Washington Convention Center Authority v. JohnsonDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2008
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.