Legal Opinion

Zvonik v. Zvonik

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided October 2, 1981No. 237, 238PublishedCited by 44 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

POPOVICH, Judge:

These are consolidated appeals from an Order entered by the court en banc dismissing appellants’ exceptions to the Chancellor’s findings. For the reasons set forth below, we affirm the lower court’s Order.

It is settled that “ ‘the findings of fact of the [cjhancellor who heard the testimony without a jury, approved by the court en banc, are entitled to the weight of a jury’s verdict; that such findings are controlling and that the court’s decree should not be reversed unless it appears that the court abused its discretion or that the court’s findings lack evidentiary support…

2Cases cited76 opinions

  1. Dilliplaine v. Lehigh Valley Trust Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1974
  2. Schott v. Westinghouse Electric Corp.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1969
  3. Buchanan v. Brentwood Federal Savings & Loan Assoc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1974
  4. Meehan v. Cheltenham TownshipSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1963
  5. Zlotziver v. ZlotziverSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1946

71 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by44 opinions

  1. Erie Telecommunications, Inc. v. City of Erie, PennsylvaniaCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1988
  2. Steamfitters Local Union No. 420 Welfare Fund v. Philip Morris, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1999
  3. Torchia on Behalf of Torchia v. TorchiaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1985
  4. Tyler v. KingSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1985
  5. American Leasing v. Morrison Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1982

39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API