Legal Opinion

In re E.T.

Supreme Court of Vermont

Decided April 11, 2008No. 2006-151PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBurgess, J.

¶ 1. E.T. appeals the trial court’s determination that she is a “patient in need of further treatment,” thus justifying her continued confinement in Vermont State Hospital pursuant to 18 V.S.A. § 7621(b). E.T. has been housed at the Hospital since 1992, after an incident in which she shot and killed her manager, wounded two co-workers, and attempted to burn down the Eveready Battery plant in Bennington. After that incident, E.T. was diagnosed with paranoid schizophrenia and found incompetent to stand trial for the charged crimes. She has since remained in the custody of the Vermont Department…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Taylor v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
  2. People v. WindhamCalifornia Supreme Court · 1977
  3. State v. MorrillSupreme Court of Vermont · 1969
  4. In Re DenioSupreme Court of Vermont · 1992
  5. In re P.S.Supreme Court of Vermont · 1997

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. In the Interest of B.D.-Y.Supreme Court of Kansas · 2008
  2. In re G.G.Supreme Court of Vermont · 2017
  3. Puppolo v. Donovan & O'Connor, LLCSupreme Court of Vermont · 2011

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API