Legal Opinion

In re G.G.

Supreme Court of Vermont

Decided February 3, 2017No. 2016-231PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtEaton, J.

¶ 1. At the center of this appeal is the issue of whether mental health patients have a due process right to waive counsel and represent themselves in proceedings on continued treatment or involuntary medication. The patient in this case, G.G., appeals from the court's denial of requests by him and his counsel to let him represent himself in his mental-health proceedings and from the court's subsequent orders of continued treatment and involuntary medication. We hold that the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment precludes G.G. from proceeding without representation in his…

2Cases cited52 opinions

  1. Mathews v. EldridgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  2. Morrissey v. BrewerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  3. Faretta v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  4. In Re GAULTSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  5. Pointer v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 1965

47 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. In re S.M.Montana Supreme Court · 2017
  2. Matter of S.M.Montana Supreme Court · 2017
  3. In the Matter of V.H., Alleged to be Seriously Mentally Impaired, V.H.Supreme Court of Iowa · 2023
  4. In the Matter of the Civil Commitment of: Michael BensonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2024
  5. Juliet Stephens v. Shannon GilmourSupreme Court of Vermont · 2026

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API