Legal Opinion

Ex Parte Acker

Texas Supreme Court

Decided July 9, 1997No. 96-0932PublishedCited by 34 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtPhillips, Chief Justice

in which CORNYN, ENOCH, SPECTOR, BAKER and ABBOTT, Justices, joined.

In this original habeas corpus proceeding, relator challenges her confinement for nonpayment of child support. The trial court ordered relator incarcerated under two separate contempt orders, one relating to regular monthly child support and the other relating to a separate health insurance obligation. We hold that the first order is unenforceable because the trial court did not inform relator of her right to counsel when she appeared pro se at the contempt hearing. We further hold that the second order is unenforceable…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Ex Parte ChambersTexas Supreme Court · 1995
  2. Ex Parte PayneCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1980
  3. Ex Parte BlasingameTexas Supreme Court · 1988
  4. Ex Parte GuntherTexas Supreme Court · 1988
  5. Ex Parte KeeneTexas Supreme Court · 1995

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by34 opinions

  1. in Re Interest of N.G., a ChildTexas Supreme Court · 2019
  2. In Re Houston, Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2002
  3. In re Rivas-LunaCourt of Appeals of Texas · 2017
  4. In Re Marks, Texas Court of Appeals, 2nd District (Fort Worth)2012
  5. In Re Aarons, Texas Court of Appeals, 9th District (Beaumont)2000

29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API