Legal Opinion

Ex Parte Keene

Texas Supreme Court

Decided November 2, 1995No. 95-0462PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Per curiam

In this original habeas corpus proceeding, relator Steven R. Keene has been held in contempt for failure to pay child support. 1 Because the order of contempt was not rendered in compliance with the requirements of section 14.32 of the Family Code, 2 a majority of the Court grants the writ of habeas corpus and, without hearing oral argument, orders the relator discharged. See Tex.R.Apf.P. 122.

Steven Keene and Patricia Ann Keene (now Radloff) were divorced in 1989. The divorce decree awarded primary custody of their child to Radloff and required Keene to pay $175 per month in child support.…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Ex Parte GuntherTexas Supreme Court · 1988

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Ex Parte GonzalesCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1997
  2. Ex Parte AckerTexas Supreme Court · 1997
  3. In re Rivas-LunaCourt of Appeals of Texas · 2017
  4. Damon Cox v. Angie Simmons, Texas Court of Appeals, 7th District (Amarillo)2007
  5. Damon Cox v. Angie Simmons, Texas Court of Appeals, 7th District (Amarillo)2007

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API