Legal Opinion

Maxwell v. Dolezal

California Court of Appeal

Decided November 4, 2014No. B254893PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

ZELON, J.

Jordan Maxwell sued Josef Dolezal after their business relationship deteriorated. The trial court dismissed Maxwell’s action after sustaining Dolezal’s demurrer to all of Maxwell’s claims without leave to amend. On appeal, we conclude that Maxwell properly stated a claim for breach of contract and that the demurrer to that cause of action was erroneously sustained. We reverse the judgment and remand for further proceedings.

FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND

In January 2013, Maxwell, in proprio persona, filed an action alleging that Dolezal had invaded his privacy by commercial…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Blank v. KirwanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1985
  2. Oasis West Realty v. GoldmanCalifornia Supreme Court · 2011
  3. Schifando v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 2003
  4. Peterson v. Cellco PartnershipCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2008
  5. Montana v. San Jose Mercury News, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1995

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Green Valley Landowners Ass'n v. City of VallejoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2015
  2. Cross v. Facebook, Inc., California Court of Appeal, 5th District2017
  3. Garcia v. Enterprise Holdings, Inc.District Court, N.D. California · 2015
  4. Facebook, Inc. v. GruninDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2015
  5. Belen v. Ryan Seacrest ProductionsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2021

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API