Lee v. Robertson Chemical Corp.
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the CourtDevik, J.
Motion for judgment of nonsuit was properly denied, but we think defendant’s exception to a material portion of the court’s instruction to the jury must be sustained. The court charged the jury that it was the duty of defendant’s driver in approaching the street intersection, under the law, to stop before entering, and “that if he failed to stop that would make him guilty of negligence per se, that is, negligence in itself.” In view of the decisions of this Court in Hill v. Lopez, 228 N. C. 433, 45 S. E. (2) 539; Nichols v. Goldston, 228 N. C. 514, 46 S. E. (2) 320; Swinson v. Nance, 219 N.…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Sebastian v. Horton Motor LinesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1938
- Groome v. . DavisSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1939
- Hill v. . LopezSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1947
- Nichols v. . GoldstonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1948
- State v. . SasseenSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1934
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Badders v. LassiterSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1954
- Hawes v. Atlantic Refining Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1953
- Blalock v. HartSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1954
- Blalock v. HartSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1954
- Davis v. City of CharlotteSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1955
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.