Legal Opinion

State v. . Sasseen

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided June 20, 1934PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtOlaRksoN, J.

We think there is no error in the court below finding the defendants “not guilty” on the special verdict. In the special verdict is the following part of the ordinance of the city of Charlotte, N. C.: “(A) Said person, firm or corporation shall have filed with the treasurer of the city of Charlotte, a policy or policies of liability insurance with a reliable and responsible company authorized to do business in the State of North Carolina, in form to be approved by the city attorney, indemnifying the licensee as to each cab, taxi-cab, ‘U-Drive-It’ or for-hire ear or automobile in the sum of…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. State v. . LangstonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1883
  2. State v. . FreshwaterSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1922
  3. State v. . StallingsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1925
  4. Flemming v. City of AshevilleSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1934
  5. Flemming v. City of AshevilleSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1933

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Duncan v. City of CharlotteSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1951
  2. Brumley v. . BaxterSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1945
  3. Brumley v. BaxterSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1945
  4. State v. EllisSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1964
  5. Covey Drive Yourself & Garage v. City of PortlandOregon Supreme Court · 1937

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API