Legal Opinion
State v. Osuch
Connecticut Appellate Court
Decided October 26, 2010No. AC 30489PublishedCited by 20 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
LAVERY, J.
The defendant, David Osuch, 1 appeals from the judgment of the trial court dismissing his motion to correct an illegal sentence. On appeal, the defendant claims that the court improperly determined that it did not have jurisdiction to address his motion and that the court should have corrected his sentence because it was based on inaccurate information. Although we agree with the defendant that the court improperly determined that it lacked jurisdiction, we conclude that the doctrine of res judicata bars review of the merits of his claim.
The following facts and procedural…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Zizka v. Water Pollution Control AuthoritySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1985
- Connecticut National Bank v. RytmanSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1997
- State v. McNellisConnecticut Appellate Court · 1988
- Lynch v. Granby Holdings, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1994
- Sabrowski v. SabrowskiSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2007
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- Perez-Dickson v. City of BridgeportSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2012
- State v. Martin M.Connecticut Appellate Court · 2013
- Girolametti v. Michael Horton Assocs., Inc.Connecticut Appellate Court · 2017
- State v. WalkerConnecticut Appellate Court · 2019
- State v. BischoffConnecticut Appellate Court · 2019
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.