Legal Opinion
Murphy v. Elms Hotel
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Decided April 8, 1926PublishedCited by 30 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtWheeler, C. J.
The motion to dismiss was based upon the taking of the appeal on June 30th, when the finding and award was made on June 16th. General Statutes, § 5366, as amended by Public Acts of 1919, Chapter 142, § 14, provides for the procedure upon an appeal from a finding and award by the commissioner, and limits the time within which either party may take his appeal to ten days after entry of such finding. Undoubtedly the General Assembly intended this provision to mean ten days after notice to the party of the entry of such finding; otherwise, in the event of the failure of the commissioner to notify…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- O'brien's PetitionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1906
- Equitable Trust Co. v. PlumeSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1918
- State v. CaplanSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1912
- Orcutt's Appeal From ProbateSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1892
- Paiwich v. KrieswalisSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1921
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by30 opinions
- Reilly v. Antonio Pepe Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1928
- Avery, Appeal From ProbateSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1933
- Hubbard v. Planning CommissionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1963
- Ragali v. HolmesSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1930
- State v. BoucherSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1935
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.