Legal Opinion
Smith v. Carlson
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Decided January 24, 1941No. Nos. 32,514, 32,515PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Peterson, Justice.
The appeal involves two actions which were tried together. The plaintiffs in the respective actions are husband and wife. The wife was driving the husband’s automobile. She was injured by the turning over of the automobile in avoiding a collision with defendant’s team and wagon driven by his servant. The wife sued to recover for personal injuries and the husband for resulting damage and injury to his automobile.
The accident happened on the evening of October 4, 1939. At the time the wife Avas on her way home from Belle Plaine. Tavo small children were in the car with her.…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Purcell v. St. Paul City Ry. Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1892
- Geisen v. LuceSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1932
- Lee v. DonnellySupreme Court of Vermont · 1921
- Wilson v. Northern Pacific RailroadSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1879
- Anderson v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1940
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Christensen v. Hennepin Transportation Co. Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1943
- Schrader v. KrieselSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1950
- Schmitt v. EmerySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1942
- Merritt v. StuveSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1943
- Cooper v. HoeglundSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1946
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.