Legal Opinion
Pacific Gas & Electric Co. v. United States
United States Court of Federal Claims
Decided June 8, 2011No. Nos. 07-157, 07-167CPublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
SMITH, Senior Judge:
Before the Court is the California Power Exchange Corporation’s (“CalPX”) Motion to Quash Notice, filed by special appearance as a third-party noticee pursuant to Rule 14(c)(1) of the Rules of the United States Court of Federal Claims (“RCFC”).1 After holding oral argument, the Court entered an Order “eonelud[ing] that there is no identifiable, realistic interest that the CalPX may have in the above-captioned matter- As a result, the Court hereby GRANTS the CalPX’s Motion to Quash Notice.” Order, Dec. 1, 2010, CM/ECF No. 242. This Memorandum Opinion sets…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Bowser, Inc. v. The United States and General Steel Tank Co., Inc., Third-PartyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1970
- Carrier Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1976
- RSH Constructors, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1990
- Midwest Industrial Painting v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1983
- Del-Rio Drilling Programs, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1989
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Uusi, LLC, and Oldnar Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2013
- 3rd Eye Surveillance, LLC v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2016
- Giesecke & Devrient Gmbh v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2022