Uzoukwu v. Metropolitan Washington Council of Governments
District Court, District of Columbia
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION 1
ROBERT L. WILKINS, District Judge.
In this employment discrimination action pro se plaintiff Chinyere Uzoukwu asserts disparate treatment and retaliation claims pursuant to Title VII, 42 U.S.C. § 2000e et seq., the Age Discrimination in Employment Act (“ADEA”), 29 U.S.C. § 621 et seq., and the Americans With Disabilities Act (“ADA”), 42 U.S.C. § 12101 et seq. (See Compl. ¶¶ 1-2.) She also raises potential claims under the Equal Pay Act, 29 U.S.C. § 206(d) and asserts various claims under District of Columbia law. (See Compl. ¶¶ 2, 51, 52.) Uzoukwu brings these claims…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Baldwin County Welcome Center v. BrownSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Greer v. Board of Trustees University of District of ColumbiaDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2015
- Briscoe v. Costco Wholesale Corp.District Court, District of Columbia · 2014
- Uzoukwu v. Metropolitan Washington Council of GovernmentsDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2013
- Uzoukwu v. Metropolitan Washington Council of GovernmentsDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2014
- Chisholm v. LanierDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2012