Legal Opinion
Saulsbury Orchards & Almond Processing, Inc. v. Yeutter
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided October 29, 1990No. 87-2955PublishedCited by 28 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
O’SCANNLAIN, Circuit Judge:
Saulsbury Orchards, an almond handler, brought an action challenging the constitutionality of an almond marketing order promulgated by the Secretary of Agriculture under the Agricultural Marketing Agreement Act. The district court dismissed the complaint for failure to exhaust administrative remedies under the Act.
I
Congress enacted the Agricultural Marketing Agreement Act ("Act”) in 1937. See 7 U.S.C. §§ 601-674. The Act authorizes the Secretary of Agriculture to promulgate marketing orders designed to establish and maintain orderly marketing conditions. See 7…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Harlow v. FitzgeraldSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Federal Bureau of NarcoticsSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Anderson v. CreightonSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Weinberger v. SalfiSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Bush v. LucasSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by28 opinions
- Native Ecosystems Council v. DombeckCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2002
- Gallo Cattle Company, a California Limited Partnership v. The United States Department of AgricultureCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1998
- Idaho Sporting Congress, Inc. v. RittenhouseCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2002
- Massieu v. RenoCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1996
- Saideh Fisher, AKA Saideh Hassib-Tehrani Kian Hosseini Lavasani v. Immigration and Naturalization ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1994
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.