Legal Opinion
Idaho Sporting Congress, Inc. v. Rittenhouse
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided September 17, 2002No. 01-35403PublishedCited by 61 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by Judge D.W. NELSON; Dissent by Judge DAVID R. THOMPSON.
D.W. NELSON, Senior Circuit Judge.
Plaintiffs Idaho Sporting Congress, Inc. and Alliance for the Wild Rockies (collectively “Conservation Groups”) brought suit against the United States Forest Service (“Forest Service”) to enjoin two timber sales (“Lightning Ridge sale and Long Prong sale”) in the Boise National Forest (“Forest”) for violation of the National Environmental Policy Act (“NEPA”), 42 U.S.C. § 4321^1370f, and for violation of the National Forest Management Act (“Forest Act”),1 16 U.S.C. §§ 1600-1687. *961The district…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Motor Vehicle Mfrs. Assn. of United States, Inc. v. State Farm Mut. Automobile Ins. Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Marsh v. Oregon Natural Resources CouncilSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Kleppe v. Sierra ClubSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- City of Davis, a Municipal Corporation v. William T. Coleman, Jr., Secretary of TransportationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1975
- Native Ecosystems Council v. DombeckCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2002
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by61 opinions
- Alliance for the Wild Rockies v. Jim PenaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2017
- Neighbors of Cuddy Mountain v. AlexanderCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2002
- Northern Alaska Environmental Center v. KempthorneCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2006
- Great Basin Mine Watch v. HankinsCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2006
- Barnes v. United States Department of TransportationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2011
56 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.