Legal Opinion

Hardinger v. Till

Washington Supreme Court

Decided November 16, 1939No. 27735PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMillard, J.

March 10, 1937, West & Wheeler, realtors, with whom defendants listed for sale certain residential property in the city of Seattle, advertised that property as follows in a daily newspaper of Seattle:

“A Rare Bargain
“For some one wanting a home and income. A duplex property on Capitol Hill. Well finished and in good condition, 5 rooms each separate hot water heating plants, automatic oil burner. This is a real find at $3500. West & Wheeler.”

On March 12, 1937, West & Wheeler delivered an earnest money receipt to plaintiff, who paid one hundred dollars upon the purchase price and agreed to pay…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Haverty v. International Stevedoring Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1925
  2. McDonald v. McDonaldWashington Supreme Court · 1922
  3. Ramm v. Hewitt-Lea Lumber Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1908
  4. Johnson v. WilliamsWashington Supreme Court · 1925
  5. Fehler v. City of MontesanoWashington Supreme Court · 1920

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. State v. LutesWashington Supreme Court · 1951
  2. Platts v. ArneyWashington Supreme Court · 1957
  3. State v. RefsnesWashington Supreme Court · 1942
  4. Lincor Contractors, Ltd. v. HyskellCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1984
  5. Friebe v. SupancheckCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1999

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API