Legal Opinion
Friebe v. Supancheck
Court of Appeals of Washington
Decided March 1, 1999No. 42003-8-IPublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtWebster, J.
The Appellants Harold Friebe Sr. and Harold Friebe entered into a purchase and sale agreement with the Respondents James and Kristen Supancheck for the purchase of the Supanchecks’ real property that generated three rents. After the deal fell apart because one of the apartments was an illegal use, the Friebes sued the Supanchecks for breach of contract, misrepresentation, and violation of the Consumer Protection Act (CPA).
Despite being properly served, the Supanchecks did not appear in the action because they mistakenly believed their realtor’s attorney would represent them. The Friebes…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Griggs v. Averbeck Realty, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1979
- State v. KellerCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1982
- In Re the Marriage of YearoutCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1985
- Platts v. ArneyWashington Supreme Court · 1957
- Sahalee Country Club, Inc. v. Board of Tax AppealsWashington Supreme Court · 1987
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Trinity Universal Insurance v. Ohio Casualty InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2013
- Friebe v. SupancheckCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1999
- Tamosaitis v. Bechtel National, Inc.Court of Appeals of Washington · 2014
- Kaye v. Lowe's HIW, Inc.Court of Appeals of Washington · 2010
- Kaye v. Lowe's HIW, Inc.Court of Appeals of Washington · 2010
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.