Currence v. Wolf Run Mining, LLC
District Court, N.D. West Virginia
1Opinion
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF WEST VIRGINIA ELKINS KRISTOPHER CURRENCE and TRINITY CURRENCE, Plaintiffs, v. Civil Action No. 2:20-CV-10 (BAILEY) WOLF RUN MINING, LLC and ARCH COAL, INC., Defendants. MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER GRANTING IN PART DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO DISMISS Pending before this Court is Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss, in Part, the Amended Compiaint [Doc. 21]. The Motion is fully briefed and is ripe for decision. For the reasons that follow, the Court will grant the Motion in part. BACKGROUND As alleged in the Complaint, plaintiff Kristopher…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Edwards v. City of GoldsboroCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1999
- Giarratano v. JohnsonCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2008
- Anheuser-Busch, Inc. v. SchmokeCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1995
- Tolliver v. Kroger Co.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1997
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.