Legal Opinion
Schey v. Turi
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
Decided November 5, 1923No. 160PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MANTON, Circuit Judge.
This is a suit for infringement of letters patent No. 902,72J. It is for an apparatus for broiling meats. Claims 1, 2, 3, and 4 are said to be infringed. The validity of this patent has heretofore been upheld by this court in Schey v. Giovanna (C. C. A.) 273 Fed. 515; 288 Fed. 849. The application below was for a preliminary injunction. In defense, it was urged that the alleged infringing device is identical in construction and operation with the so-called W. F. Mangel’s Coney Island rotisseries of the alleged prior art, and that appellee’s device does not infringe.
We…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- United States Mitis Co. v. Detroit Steel & Spring Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1903
- Schey v. GiovannaCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1921
- Palmer v. Superior Mfg. Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1913
- Schey v. GiovannaCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1923
3Cited by6 opinions
- The Coca-Cola Company v. Tropicana Products, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1982
- Ring v. SpinaCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1945
- Western Electric Co. v. Cinema Supplies, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1935
- Ring v. SpinaCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1945
- Bowles v. SacherCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1944
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.