Legal Opinion

Schey v. Giovanna

Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit

Decided February 28, 1923No. 177PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Per curiam

We do not pause to inquire nicely into the practice pursued in respect of these appeals. Objection might be made that at least one of the orders sought to be considered is not appealable; but, it being plain that one question underlying all proceedings after interlocutory decree ha,s been fully presented to us, we shall proceed to the merits of the matter. Appellant’s proposition is in substance (see 273 Fed. at page 516) that, if he detaches a spit by taking it out of the sprocket wheel by which it is rotated, he has avoided the patent.

Interpretation of this patent must be that given by this…

2Cited by1 opinion

  1. Schey v. TuriCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1923

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API