Legal Opinion · Dissent

Bowles v. Sacher

Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit

Decided December 8, 1944No. Nos. 104, 105Published

1DissentClark, Circuit Judge

If the broader form of injunction prayed for is not to be granted in this case, I can conceive of no case where it is likely to be allowed. As the District Court well puts it, defendants “have violated those sections of the Regulation which go to the heart of the price control system, since ceiling prices are governed by the records.” 53 F. Supp. 77, at page 78. And this they did over a long period, even though the president of their own trade association gave early warning to the membership of the necessity that proper records be kept for ceiling prices on all articles. Surely repeated sales…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Hecht Co. v. BowlesSupreme Court of the United States · 1944
  2. National Labor Relations Board v. Express Publishing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1941
  3. Brown v. Hecht Co.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1943
  4. Bowles v. Montgomery Ward & Co.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1944
  5. Henderson v. BurdCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1943

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API