Legal Opinion

Village of Durand v. Love

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided June 1, 1931No. Docket No. 23, Calendar No. 35,486PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtFead, J.

This is a bill to abate, as a nuisance, a wooden building moved from one location to another within the fire limits of the village of Durand, in violation of an ordinance. The ordinance declares such building a public nuisance and requires its abatement on order of the common council. The authority to adopt such ordinance is conferred by 1 Comp. Laws 1929, §§ 1549, 1667 et seq.

Section 8 of the ordinance deals with wooden buildings. Among other things, it declares it unlawful to remove such a building from one location to another within the fire limits “without first having obtained from fhe…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Harrigan & Reid Co. v. BurtonMichigan Supreme Court · 1923
  2. L. A. Thompson Scenic Railway Co. v. McCabeMichigan Supreme Court · 1920

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Holly Development, Inc. v. Board of County CommissionersSupreme Court of Colorado · 1959
  2. Hoyt Brothers, Inc. v. City of Grand RapidsMichigan Supreme Court · 1932
  3. W. H. Barber Co. v. City of MinneapolisSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1948
  4. Board of County Com'rs of Sarpy County v. McNallyNebraska Supreme Court · 1959
  5. City of Alamogordo v. McGeeNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1958

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API