Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

United States v. Tenney

U.S. Army Court of Military Review

Decided February 22, 1983No. CM 442258PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

FOREMAN, Judge:

In accordance with his pleas, the appellant was convicted of violating Army regulations by using his official position for financial benefit (Specification 1 of Charge I), violating regulations of the U.S. Army Training and Doctrine Command by soliciting money from trainees to purchase floor wax for the barracks (Specification 2 of Charge I), violating the orders of his brigade commander by borrowing money from trainees (Specification 3 of Charge I), accepting monetary contributions from trainees (Specification 4 of Charge I), and soliciting monetary…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. United States v. DicarioUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1957
  2. United States v. BurneyUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1971
  3. United States v. KleinhansUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1964
  4. United States v. SicleyUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1955
  5. United States v. BuckUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1953

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. United States v. DeanU S Air Force Court of Military Review · 1991
  2. United States v. StockenU.S. Army Court of Military Review · 1984
  3. United States v. AntonelliU S Air Force Court of Military Review · 1993
  4. United States v. CatoU.S. Army Court of Military Review · 1984
  5. United States v. NeffU S Air Force Court of Military Review · 1992

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API