Legal Opinion
Vinson v. Little Bear Sawmills
Supreme Court of Alabama
Decided May 26, 1927No. 8 Div. 926PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtThomas, J.
The appellants took a non-suit with a bill of exceptions because of the exclusion of the contract from the evidence.
In this ruling there was no error. The recovery sought was for an uncertain and indefinite damage for breach of an agreement pronounced by this court to be unilateral: Jones v. Lanier, 1981 Ala. 366, 73 So. 535; Lucas E. Moore Stave Co. v. Kennedy, 212 Ala. 193, 101 So. 894; Lucas E. Moore Stave Co. v. Woodley, 213 Ala. 570, 105 So. 878; Southern Fuel Co. v. Southern R. R. Co., 215 Ala. 355, 110 So. 715.
Plaintiffs testified that they hauled more than 4,000,000 feet of lumber…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Cold Blast Transp. Co. v. Kansas City Bolt & Nut Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1902
- McIntyre Lumber & Export Co. v. Jackson Lumber Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1910
- Jones v. LanierSupreme Court of Alabama · 1916
- Scott v. Moragues Lumber Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1918
- Lucas E. Moore Stave Co. v. KennedySupreme Court of Alabama · 1924
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Cowin v. SalmonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1943
- Ben Cheeseman Realty Co. v. ThompsonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1927
- Futvoye v. ChuitesSupreme Court of Alabama · 1932
- King v. ScottSupreme Court of Alabama · 1928
- Louis Werner Sawmill Co. v. Vinson & BoltonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1929
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.