Legal Opinion

Louis Werner Sawmill Co. v. Vinson & Bolton

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided November 27, 1929No. 8 Div. 127PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSayre, J.

The action in this cause- was instituted by an attachment against “Little Bear Sawmills, a partnership composed of Louis Werner Sawmill Co., a Missouri corporation, and Hubert F. Young; and Louis Werner Sawmill Co. and Hubert F. Young,” nonresidents. This; under our statutes, was a suit against the alleged partnership and against the alleged partners. Responding to rulings of the trial court, plaintiffs amended their complaint by striking Little Bear Sawmills and Hubert F. Young as parties defendant, and the suit proceeded against Louis Werner Sawmill Company as sole defendant. So far as…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Jones v. LanierSupreme Court of Alabama · 1916
  2. Mobile, J. &. K. C. R. R. v. HawkinsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1909
  3. Vinson v. Little Bear SawmillsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1927
  4. Collins v. Vaughn Realty Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1928
  5. Willis v. HovaterAlabama Court of Appeals · 1928

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Hoffman-La Roche, Inc. v. CampbellSupreme Court of Alabama · 1987
  2. Wyoming-Indiana Oil & Gas Co. v. WestonWyoming Supreme Court · 1932
  3. Holman v. BradySupreme Court of Alabama · 1941
  4. Miller v. ThomasonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1934
  5. Wyatt v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1981

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API