Legal Opinion
Ultra Scope International, Inc. v. Extebank
New York Supreme Court
Decided July 9, 1992PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Edward J. Greenfield, J.
Plaintiff, Ultra Scope International, Inc. (Ultra), moves pursuant to CPLR 3212 for summary judgment on its first or second causes of action pursuant to an irrevocable letter of credit, No. imp-026260, and amendments made thereto issued by defendant, Extebank. Defendant cross-moves for a default judgment on its counterclaim.
The salient facts are as follows:
Raul Blanco, Ltd. (RBL) entered into a contract with Ultra to purchase ladies garments, fabrics and trims manufactured by Ultra in Korea. The terms of the contract required RBL to pay for the…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Burns Jackson Miller Summit & Spitzer v. LindnerNew York Court of Appeals · 1983
- George Backer Management Corp. v. Acme Quilting Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1978
- Airco Alloys Division v. Niagara Mohawk Power Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1980
- Surlak v. SurlakAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1983
- Kuehne & Nagel, Inc. v. BaidenNew York Court of Appeals · 1975
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Boston Hides & Furs, Ltd. v. Sumitomo Bank, Ltd.District Court, D. Massachusetts · 1994
- Garamella v. New York Medical CollegeDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 1998
- Trust Co. of Okl. v. State Ex Rel. DdhsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1995
- Garamella for Estate of Almonte v. NY Med. Coll.District Court, D. Connecticut · 1998
- TC Skyward Aviation U.S., Inc. v. Deutsche Bank AG, New York BranchDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2021