Airco Alloys Division v. Niagara Mohawk Power Corp.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Moule, J.
The United States, pursuant to treaties with Canada, is permitted to divert portions of the flow of the Niagara River for the purpose of generating hydroelectric power. The Federal Power Commission (FPC) authorized the Niagara Mohawk Power Corporation (Niagara Mohawk) by license to utilize a portion of the river flow for power generation at *74certain generating stations on the Niagara River known as Federal Power Commission Project 16 (Project 16) with a capacity of 445,000 kilowatts.
On June 7, 1956 a rock slide destroyed the generating station which was the…
2Cases cited30 opinions
- Lawrence v. . FoxNew York Court of Appeals · 1859
- H. R. Moch Co. v. Rensselaer Water Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1928
- Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co. v. WesolowskiNew York Court of Appeals · 1973
- Mallad Construction Corp. v. County Federal Savings & Loan Ass'nNew York Court of Appeals · 1973
- Port Chester Electrical Construction Corp. v. AtlasNew York Court of Appeals · 1976
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by173 opinions
- Readco, Inc., R.D.P. Associates, Lan Associates Xii and Antonio Reale v. Marine Midland Bank Eagle Rock Holding, Inc., a New York Corp.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1996
- Guilbert v. GardnerCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2007
- William Rothenberg v. Lincoln Farm Camp, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1985
- Guilbert v. GardnerCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2007
- Aetna Casualty And Surety Co. v. Aniero Concrete Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2005
168 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.