Legal Opinion
Kuehne & Nagel, Inc. v. Baiden
New York Court of Appeals
Decided May 7, 1975PublishedCited by 70 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtGabrielli, J.
The record establishes the absence of any defense to the action and, accordingly, plaintiff’s cross motion for summary judgment should have been granted.
Plaintiff, as assignee of Amber Maritime Corporation under a ship charterer’s liability policy issued to it by defendants, commenced this action for losses sustained as a result of cargo damage during a voyage from Gdynia, Poland to Santa Maria, Colombia. At Gdynia, a cargo of 300 jeeps was booked to Santa *541Maria by Caribe Manufacturing Co., Ltda. (Caribe), a Colombian corporation. When the jeeps were loaded, 82 were stowed on deck and the…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Liverpool & Great Western Steam Co. v. Phenix InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1889
- Schnell v. the VallescuraSupreme Court of the United States · 1934
- Indig v. FinkelsteinNew York Court of Appeals · 1968
- Schwinger v. . RaymondNew York Court of Appeals · 1880
- Sonnesen v. Panama Transport Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1948
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by70 opinions
- John William Costello Associates, Inc. v. Standard Metals Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1984
- Bank of America, National Ass'n v. BrannonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2017
- Town of Angelica v. SmithAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2011
- Ferluckaj v. Goldman Sachs & Co.New York Court of Appeals · 2009
- G. B. Kent & Sons, Ltd. v. Helena Rubinstein, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1979
65 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.