Legal Opinion

Bandy v. Mt. Diablo Unified School District

California Court of Appeal

Decided March 15, 1976No. Docket Nos. 35976, 35977, 35978PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

MOLINARI, P. J.

In these consolidated appeals the question presented is whether an attorney, who" was employed to prosecute personal injury actions under a contingent fee contract and for whom other counsel was substituted while the litigation was pending, is entitled to a lien in a stated amount upon the proceeds of an anticipated recovery by his former client by settlement or judgment. We have concluded that although an attorney employed under a contingent fee contract providing for a lien has a lien upon the anticipated recovery he may not intervene in his former client’s personal…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Fracasse v. BrentCalifornia Supreme Court · 1972
  2. Isrin v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1965
  3. Weiss v. MarcusCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1975
  4. Block v. California Physicians' ServiceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1966
  5. Haupt v. Charlie's Kosher MarketCalifornia Supreme Court · 1941

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Carroll v. Interstate Brands Corp.California Court of Appeal · 2002
  2. Muller v. Fresno Community Hospital & Medical CenterCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2009
  3. Brown v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2004
  4. Hansen v. JacobsenCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1986
  5. Lovett v. CarrascoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1998

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API