Legal Opinion

Haupt v. Charlie's Kosher Market

California Supreme Court

Decided April 25, 1941No. L. A. 16957PublishedCited by 27 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGibson, C. J.

The is an appeal by an attaching creditor from a judgment giving priority to an attorney’s lien.

Plaintiff, an attorney, was employed by one Mason to prosecute a personal injury action against certain of the above-named defendants. Plaintiff proceeded under a contingent-fee contract which provided that he should receive one-third of any recovery and should have a “lien on the said cause of action, judgment, settlement, amount due or to be paid or become due” for his fee and to repay costs advanced by him.

As a result of plaintiff’s successful prosecution of the personal injury action, a…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Burns v. PetersCalifornia Supreme Court · 1936
  2. McGee v. AllenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1936
  3. Tracy v. RingoleCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1927
  4. City of Los Angeles v. KnappCalifornia Supreme Court · 1936
  5. Hoffman v. VallejoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1873

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by27 opinions

  1. Isrin v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1965
  2. Weiss v. MarcusCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1975
  3. Cetenko v. United California BankCalifornia Supreme Court · 1982
  4. In the Matter of Pacific Far East Line, Inc., Debtor. Joseph M. Alioto v. Official Creditor CommitteeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1981
  5. Wagner v. SariottiCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1943

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API