Haupt v. Charlie's Kosher Market
California Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtGibson, C. J.
The is an appeal by an attaching creditor from a judgment giving priority to an attorney’s lien.
Plaintiff, an attorney, was employed by one Mason to prosecute a personal injury action against certain of the above-named defendants. Plaintiff proceeded under a contingent-fee contract which provided that he should receive one-third of any recovery and should have a “lien on the said cause of action, judgment, settlement, amount due or to be paid or become due” for his fee and to repay costs advanced by him.
As a result of plaintiff’s successful prosecution of the personal injury action, a…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Burns v. PetersCalifornia Supreme Court · 1936
- McGee v. AllenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1936
- Tracy v. RingoleCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1927
- City of Los Angeles v. KnappCalifornia Supreme Court · 1936
- Hoffman v. VallejoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1873
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by27 opinions
- Isrin v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1965
- Weiss v. MarcusCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1975
- Cetenko v. United California BankCalifornia Supreme Court · 1982
- In the Matter of Pacific Far East Line, Inc., Debtor. Joseph M. Alioto v. Official Creditor CommitteeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1981
- Wagner v. SariottiCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1943
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.