Legal Opinion

Diller Unemployment Compensation Case

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided March 19, 1963No. Appeal, No. 424PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Woodside, J.,

The appellant in this unemployment compensation case was denied benefits by the bureau, referee and board.

She and her husband were employed in Lititz. They had previously lived in Waynesboro, where the claimant owned a house. The tenants in the claimant’s house “moved out and skipped rent,” so the claimant and her husband left their employment and returned to Waynesboro, where the husband worked on the claimant’s house and subsequently became employed. The claimant says she left her employment to follow her husband who voluntarily left his employment to look after her…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Tronieri Unemployment Compensation CaseSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1949
  2. Mettetal Unemployment Compensation CaseSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1958
  3. Cochran Unemployment Compensation CaseSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1962
  4. Domico Unemployment Compensation CaseSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1962
  5. Naugle Unemployment Compensation CaseSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1961

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Crumbling v. Commonwealth of PennsylvaniaCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1974
  2. Ferguson v. Sturm, Ruger & Co., Inc.District Court, D. Connecticut · 1981

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API