Legal Opinion

State v. Coombs

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided July 3, 1985No. 84-1075PublishedCited by 29 opinions

1Per curiam

The sole question before this court is whether the trial court, as trier of fact, erred in failing to find defendant not guilty by reason of insanity. The court of appeals held that the lower court did so err. We reverse.

The standard for demonstrating legal insanity in a criminal case was enunciated in State v. Staten (1969), 18 Ohio St. 2d 13 [47 O.O.2d 82], paragraph two of the syllabus:

“In order to establish the defense of insanity where raised by plea in a criminal proceeding, the accused must establish by a preponderance of the evidence that disease or other defect of his mind had so…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. State v. ThomasOhio Supreme Court · 1982
  2. State v. StatenOhio Supreme Court · 1969
  3. State v. EubankOhio Supreme Court · 1979

3Cited by29 opinions

  1. State v. SteffenOhio Supreme Court · 1987
  2. State v. SowellOhio Supreme Court · 1988
  3. In re WatsonOhio Supreme Court · 1989
  4. Thompson v. Central Ohio Cellular, Inc.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1994
  5. State v. SorrelsOhio Court of Appeals · 1991

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API