Legal Opinion

State v. Sorrels

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided February 20, 1991No. C-900115PublishedCited by 30 opinions

1Per curiam

The defendant-appellant, Steven Sorrels, appeals from the trial court’s order convicting him of assault, in violation of R.C. 2903.13, following a bench trial. The defendant contends that the trial court committed the following errors: (1) admitted into evidence documents which were hearsay; (2) overruled his motion for a new trial when the judgment was against the manifest weight of the evidence; and (3) shifted the burden from the state to the defendant to prove the defense of alibi. We find that the defendant’s first and third assignments of error are well taken.

On March 7, 1989, Kendra…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Chapman v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  2. State v. DehassOhio Supreme Court · 1967
  3. Tibbs v. FloridaSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  4. State v. MaurerOhio Supreme Court · 1984
  5. State v. SageOhio Supreme Court · 1987

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by30 opinions

  1. Meyers v. Hot Bagels Factory, Inc.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1999
  2. State v. RichcreekOhio Court of Appeals · 2011
  3. John Soliday Financial Group, L.L.C. v. PittengerOhio Court of Appeals · 2010
  4. State v. ReynoldsOhio Court of Appeals · 2018
  5. State v. NicholsOhio Court of Appeals · 2025

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API