Legal Opinion

City Finance Co. v. Kloostra

Michigan Court of Appeals

Decided May 23, 1973No. Docket 13590PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtR. B. Burns, P. J.

On August 18,1969, defendant and her husband, Harold J. Kloostra, co-signed a promissory note payable to plaintiff’s predecessor. That note evidenced a loan of $472.24 by the latter to the former. At the time she signed the note defendant had no separate estate. An automobile was purchased with the proceeds of the loan. On November 6, 1970, defendant and Harold were divorced. As of January 18, 1971, there was a balance due on the loan of $400.12. By this time Harold had departed for parts unknown — taking with him the automobile purchased with the proceeds of the loan of August 18, 1969. Suit…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Pfeiffer v. Board of EducationMichigan Supreme Court · 1898
  2. Yedinak v. YedinakMichigan Supreme Court · 1970
  3. Burdick v. Secretary of StateMichigan Supreme Court · 1964
  4. Holland v. Clerk of Garden CityMichigan Supreme Court · 1941
  5. Tong v. MarvinMichigan Supreme Court · 1866

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. North Ottawa Community Hospital v. KieftMichigan Supreme Court · 1998
  2. United States of America, Appellee-Cross-Appellant v. Ben T. Lowell and Louise D. Lowell, Appellants-Cross-AppelleesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1977
  3. Carpenter v. SmithMichigan Court of Appeals · 1985
  4. Michigan National Leasing Corp. v. CardilloMichigan Court of Appeals · 1981
  5. Michigan National Bank of Detroit v. McCormick (In Re McCormick)United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Michigan · 1983

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API