Rice v. Warden of Maryland Penitentiary
Court of Appeals of Maryland
1Per curiam
The Post Conviction Procedure Act is a procedural act and not an enlargement of substantive rights of review. State v. D’Onofrio, 221 Md. 20, 155 A. 2d 643. The question of the legality of search and seizure cannot be raised under the Act. Banks v. Warden, 220 Md. 652, 151 A. 2d 897; Mears v. Warden, 220 Md. 682, 155 A. 2d 72. After conviction a question of bail may not be raised on habeas corpus, Brooks v. Warden, 218 Md. 650, 145 A. 2d 569; nor may alleged irregularities in preliminary proceedings or procedures which may not be raised on habeas corpus be reviewed under the Post Conviction…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- State v. D'ONOFRIOCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1959
- Banks v. WardenCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2001
- Mears v. WardenCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1959
- Brooks v. Warden of Maryland PenitentiaryCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2001
3Cited by3 opinions
- Mason v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1987
- Rice v. WardenCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1959
- State v. LanoueSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1976