Legal Opinion

Brooks v. Warden of Maryland Penitentiary

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided September 26, 2001No. [H.C. No. 26, September Term, 1958.]PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Per curiam

The application for leave to appeal from a denial of the writ of habeas corpus is denied, with costs.

Judge Day, of the Circuit Court for Harford County, properly ruled the applicant was not entitled to the writ applied for, but he assigned no reasons for his action other than by pointing out that the applicant was in error because he was not only given an opportunity to obtain counsel but was actually represented by counsel at his trial in the Criminal Court of Baltimore (Smith, C. J.).

With regard to the other reasons assigned by the applicant for granting the writ, we have repeatedly held…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Person v. WardenCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1958
  2. Savoy v. Warden of Maryland House of CorrectionCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1977
  3. Howell v. Warden of Maryland House of CorrectionCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1958
  4. Cook v. WardenCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1971
  5. Hamilton v. Warden of Maryland House of CorrectionCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1958

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Rice v. WardenCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1959
  2. Slater v. Warden of Maryland PenitentiaryCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1963
  3. Warrington v. Warden of Maryland PenitentiaryCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1986
  4. Lloyd v. Warden, Maryland PenitentiaryDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 1964
  5. Rice v. Warden of Maryland PenitentiaryCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1959

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API