Legal Opinion

Mears v. Warden

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided October 21, 1959No. P. C. No. 28PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Per curiam

In his application for leave to appeal from the denial and dismissal of his petition for post conviction relief, the applicant assigned two reasons for allowing his appeal. He contends (i) that the evidence on which he was convicted of a violation of the narcotics law was obtained by means of an illegal search and seizure in violation of his constitutional rights and (ii) that—other than the alleged prohibited evi*683dence—there was no evidence legally sufficient to sustain a conviction.

The contention concerning the legality and constitutionality of the search and seizure although available on…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Banks v. WardenCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2001

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Hall v. Warden of Maryland PenitentiaryCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1961
  2. Rice v. WardenCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1959
  3. Ralph v. Warden of Maryland PenitentiaryCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1962
  4. Rayne v. Warden of Maryland PenitentiaryCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1960
  5. Warrington v. Warden of Maryland PenitentiaryCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1986

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API