Legal Opinion
Rice v. Warden
Court of Appeals of Maryland
Decided December 21, 1959No. [P.C. No. 48, September Term, 1959.]PublishedCited by 23 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
221 Md. 604 (1959)
156 A.2d 632
RICE
v.
WARDEN OF MARYLAND PENITENTIARY
[P.C. No. 48, September Term, 1959.]
Court of Appeals of Maryland.
Decided December 21, 1959.
Before BRUNE, C.J., and HENDERSON, HAMMOND, PRESCOTT and HORNEY, JJ.
2Per curiam
The Post Conviction Procedure Act is a procedural act and not an enlargement of substantive rights of review. State v. D'Onofrio, 221 Md. 20, 155 A.2d 643. The question of the legality of search and seizure cannot be raised under the Act. Banks v. Warden, 220 Md. 652, 151 A.2d 897; Mears v. Warden, 220 Md. 682, 155 A.2d 72. After conviction a question of bail may not be…
3Cases cited6 opinions
- State v. D'ONOFRIOCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1959
- Dormay Construction Corp. v. Doric Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1992
- Banks v. WardenCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2001
- Mears v. WardenCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1959
- Brooks v. Warden of Maryland PenitentiaryCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2001
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
4Cited by23 opinions
- Polek v. J.P. Morgan Chase Bank, N.A.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 2012
- Alternatives Unlimited, Inc. v. New Baltimore City Board of School CommissionersCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2004
- Creamer v. HelferstayCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1982
- Mason v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1987
- Everhart v. MilesCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1980
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.