Langlois v. Wisconsin National Life Insurance

1. Defendant not entitled to new trial as a matter of right. Defendant’s principal challenge is that Questions Nos. 2 and 3 of the special verdict did not correctly present the issues of fact with respect to the claim of fraud. It does not appear that defendant requested any form of special verdict. It made no objection to the form prepared by the court. It did not move for a new trial on the ground of impropriety in the form of verdict.

*154“We deem the correct rule to be that no error of the court should be reviewable as a matter of right on appeal without first moving in the trial court for. a…