Legal Opinion
Hastings v. Superior Court
California Court of Appeal
Decided March 2, 1955No. Civ. 5082PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
THE COURT.
The showing made by petitioner is that on August 2, 1949, an action was filed in the Superior Court of Riverside County entitled George H. Gobruegge v. J. M. Hastings. About October 19, 1949, an answer and cross-complaint were filed. Counsel for plaintiff subsequently filed a memorandum moving to set the cause for trial, and it was subsequently set for September 2, 1953, but it was not then tried. On that date it was continued by a written stipulation of the parties agreeing “that the above-entitled action, set for trial September 2d, 1953, be reset for some convenient date, due to…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- City of Los Angeles v. Superior Court of Tuolumne Cty.California Supreme Court · 1921
- Boyd v. Southern Pacific R. R. Co.California Supreme Court · 1921
- Charles L. Donohoe Co. v. Superior Court of GlennCalifornia Supreme Court · 1927
- Anderson v. City of San DiegoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1953
- Bank of America National Trust & Savings Ass'n v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1937
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Continental Pacific Lines v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1956
- Fannin Corp. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1974
- Fisher v. Superior Court of Los Angeles CountyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1958
- Lewis v. GreenspunCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1958
- Specht v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1962