Legal Opinion

Boyd v. Southern Pacific R. R. Co.

California Supreme Court

Decided March 25, 1921No. L. A. No. 6372PublishedCited by 20 opinions

The facts are stated in the opinion of th.e court.

1Opinion of the CourtOlney, J.

This is an appeal by the plaintiff from a judgment for the defendant based upon an order dismissing the action in accord with the requirements of section 583 of the Code of Civil Procedure, because of failure to bring the action to trial within five years after answer filed. The code section mentioned reads:

“Dismissal of Actions. The court may in its discretion dismiss any action for want of prosecution on motion of the defendant and after due notice to the plaintiff, whenever plaintiff has failed for two years after answer filed to bring such action to trial. Any action heretofore or…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Larkin v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1916

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Miller & Lux Inc. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1923
  2. Woley v. TurkusCalifornia Supreme Court · 1958
  3. Andersen v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1921
  4. Steinbauer v. BondesenCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1932
  5. Berger v. McMahanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1953

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API