Legal Opinion

In the Interest of E.R.

Texas Supreme Court

Decided July 6, 2012No. 11-0282PublishedCited by 293 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtChief Justice Jefferson

When the State seeks to sever permanently the relationship between a parent and a child, it must first observe fundamentally fair procedures.1 The most basic of these is notice. If the State cannot deliver notice in person, it may try other means that will likely reach the parent.2 We consider today whether serving the parent in a newspaper advertisement, “a *555poor and sometimes a hopeless substitute for actual service,”3 is constitutionally acceptable when the State knew the mother’s identity, was in regular contact with her, and had at least one in-person meeting with her after it sued to…

2Cases cited54 opinions

  1. Mathews v. EldridgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  2. Mullane v. Central Hanover Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1950
  3. Santosky v. KramerSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  4. Stanley v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  5. Pennoyer v. NeffSupreme Court of the United States · 1878

49 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by293 opinions

  1. In the Interest of E.N.C., J.A.C., S.A.L., N.A.G. and C.G.L.Texas Supreme Court · 2012
  2. In the Interest of E.C.R., ChildTexas Supreme Court · 2013
  3. in the Interest of K.M.L., a ChildTexas Supreme Court · 2014
  4. Zanchi v. LaneTexas Supreme Court · 2013
  5. in the Interest of O.R.F., a Child, Texas Court of Appeals, 6th District (Texarkana)2013

288 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API